Trabert v. United States

Third Circuit

Trabert v. United States

26 F.2d 1022, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3861

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1928

DocketNo. 3853

StatusPublished

This text of 26 F.2d 1022 (Trabert v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Trabert v. United States, 26 F.2d 1022, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3861 (3d Cir. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below Max Trabert was charged under the National Prohibition Law with maintaining a nuisance. On hearing, at which the defendant was represented by counsel, the government produced several witnesses, who proved the premises here involved were fitted up for and used as a hotel, and the sale therein on different days of high-powered beer. No witnesses were called in contradiction. After due consideration had, the court entered a decree holding the defendant was maintaining a nuisance on the premises, and closed for one year the first and second floors thereof, with the exception of the stairway leading to the third and fourth floors. Thereupon this appeal was taken. It simply involves alleged error in the court’s finding of fact.

'An examination of the record not only shows no error, but, on the contrary, the correctness of its finding. Its decree is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the court below Max Trabert was charged under the National Prohibition Law with maintaining a nuisance. On hearing, at which the defendant was represented by counsel, the government produced several witnesses, who proved the premises here involved were fitted up for and used as a hotel, and the sale therein on different days of high-powered beer. No witnesses were called in contradiction. After due consideration had, the court entered a decree holding the defendant was maintaining a nuisance on the premises, and closed for one year the first and second floors thereof, with the exception of the stairway leading to the third and fourth floors. Thereupon this appeal was taken. It simply involves alleged error in the court’s finding of fact.

'An examination of the record not only shows no error, but, on the contrary, the correctness of its finding. Its decree is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 F.2d 1022, 1928 U.S. App. LEXIS 3861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/trabert-v-united-states-ca3-1928.