Trabandt v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance

131 Mass. 167, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 207
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 11, 1881·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

The contract of insurance was between the defendant and the wife. The premiums were paid by the husband with her consent and on .account of her policy. He incurred no responsibility to her by reason of such payment, [169]*169was no party to her contract with the defendant, and suffered no injury from the invalidity of that contract. If any action can be maintained to recover the amount of the premiums so paid, it must be in her name, and not in his. North America Ins. Co. v. Wilson, 111 Mass. 542. Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Trabandt v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance, 131 Mass. 167, 1881 Mass. LEXIS 207 (Mass. 1881).

131 Mass. 167 (Trabandt v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aetna Life Insurance v. Penn
1 Hosea's Rep. 209 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1907)
Taylor v. Grand Lodge
105 N.W. 408 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. v. Aultman, Miller & Co.
84 N.W. 379 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Jurgens v. New York Life Insurance
45 P. 1054 (California Supreme Court, 1896)