TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos

226 A.D.2d 445, 640 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3560
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 8, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover on two promissory notes, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Amann, J.), dated March 13, 1995, which granted the plaintiff’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3213 for summary judgment in lieu of complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants’ unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations of lack of consideration and fraud in the inducement were insufficient to defeat the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Germano v Friedman, 221 AD2d 501). We have reviewed the defendants’ remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos, 226 A.D.2d 445, 640 N.Y.S.2d 803, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 445 (TPZ Corp. v. Rigakos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

George L. Penny, Inc. v. Zaweski
254 A.D.2d 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Colonial Commercial Corp. v. Breskel Associates
238 A.D.2d 539 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)