TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC v. Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 30, 2021·No. 2:17-cv-00346·Unknown

Opinion

1 | JOHNR. BAILEY Nevada Bar No. 0137 2 || DENNIS L. KENNEDY Nevada Bar No. 1462 3 || JOSHUA P. GILMORE Nevada Bar No. 11576 4 || PAUL C. WILLIAMS Nevada Bar No. 12524 5 || STEPHANIE J. GLANTZ Nevada Bar No. 14878 6 || BAILEY’ KENNEDY 8984 Spanish Ridge Avenue 7 || Las Vegas, Nevada 89148-1302 Telephone: 702.562.8820 8 || Facsimile: 702.562.8821 JBailey@BaileyKennedy.com 9 || DKennedy@BaileyKennedy.com JGilmore@BaileyKennedy.com 10 || PWilliams@BaileyKennedy.com SGlantz@BaileyKennedy.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants 12 | TPOV Enterprises, LLC; TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC; = and Rowen Seibel 2s 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Za 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 15 | TPOV ENTERPRISES 16, LLC, a Delaware Case No. 2:17-cv-00346-JCM-VCF A limited liability company, 16 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND vs Plaintiff, DEADLINES TO FILE RESPONSES TO MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18 | PARIS LAS VEGAS OPERATING COMPANY, | AND REPLY BRIEFS IN SUPPORT OF THE LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, SAME [ECF NOS. 269-72] 19 50 Defendant. (SECOND REQUEST) 21 || PARIS LAS VEGAS OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 22 Counterclaimant, 23 Vs. 24 || TPOV ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, TROV ENTERPRISES 16, 25 || LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Rowen Seibel, an individual, 26 Counterdefendants. 27 28 Page 1 of 3

1 Pursuant to LR JA 6-1, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC (“TPOV 2 || 16”); Counterdefendant TPOV Enterprises, LLC (“TPOV”); Counterdefendant Rowen Seibel 3 || (“Seibel”) (collectively, “Plaintiff/Counterdefendants”); and Defendant/Counterclaimant Paris Las 4 || Vegas Operating Company, LLC (“Paris”) (collectively, the “Parties”) stipulate and agree as 5 || follows: 6 1. On March 12, 2021, Plaintiff/Counterdefendants filed a Motion for Summary 7 || Judgment on Paris’s Counterclaims. (ECF Nos. 269, 272.) 8 2. On March 12, 2021, Paris filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on all of TROV 9 || 16’s claims and Paris’s counterclaims. (ECF Nos. 270-271.) 10 3. On April 8, 2021, the Parties stipulated to extend the deadline to respond to the 11 || respective motions for summary judgment to April 30, 2021, and to file reply briefs in support of = 12 || their respective motions for summary judgment to May 21, 2021. (ECF No. 291.) 13 4. On April 9, 2021, this Court entered an Order granting the Parties’ Stipulation. 72 14 || (ECF No. 292.) 15 5. The deadline to file responses to motions for summary judgment shall be extended 16 | from April 30, 2021, to May 24, 2021. 17 6. The deadline to file reply briefs in support of motions for summary judgment shall 18 | be extended from May 21, 2021 to June 14, 2021. 19 7. Good cause exists to extend the briefing schedules as set forth above. Recently, in 20 || the case Seibel v. PHWLYV, LLC, Case No. A-17-751759-B (the “State Court Matter”), currently 21 || pending before the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, County of Clark (“State 22 || Court”), the State Court granted Paris and its affiliates’ Motion to Compel Documents Withheld on 23 || the Basis of the Attorney-Client Privilege Pursuant to the Crime-Fraud Exception. The State Court 24 | has ordered Paris and its affiliates to prepare Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order, 25 || which have not yet been entered. Pursuant to an agreement between the Parties, discovery 26 || propounded in the State Court Matter can be used in this matter and discovery propounded in this 27 || matter can be used in the State Court Matter. Without waiver of any rights by the Parties, the 28 | current extension will allow the Parties to evaluate the potential effect of the State Court’s Page 2 of 3

1 || forthcoming Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order (once entered) on this matter and/or 2 || the pending motions for summary judgment, if any. 3 8. This extension is sought in good faith and not for purposes of unduly delaying trial. 4 || Dated this 29" day of April, 2021. Dated this 29" day of April, 2021. 5 || BAILEY %KENNEDY PISANELLI BICE PLLC 6 || By: /s/ Paul C. Williams By:_/s/ M. Magali Mercera JOHN R. BAILEY James J. Pisanelli, Esq., Bar No. 4027 7 DENNIS L. KENNEDY Debra L. Spinelli, Esq., Bar No. 9695 JOSHUA P. GILMORE M. Magali Mercera, Esq., Bar No. 11742 8 PAUL C. WILLIAMS 400 South 7" Street, Suite 300 STEPHANIE J. GLANTZ Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 9 | Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants JJP@pisanellibice.com TPOV Enterprises, LLC, TPOV Enterprises DLS@pisanellibice.com 10 || 16, LLC, and Rowen Seibel MMM @pisanellibice.com Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant 11 Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC = 12 23 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. Zi 14 ee IO. Malan 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18 19 || Respectfully submitted by: 20 || BAILEY “KENNEDY 21 || By:/s/ Paul C. Williams JOHN R. BAILEY JOSHUA P. GILMORE STEPHANIE J. GLANTZ 24 | Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendants TPOV Enterprises, LLC, TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC, 25 || and Rowen Seibel 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC v. Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC, (D. Nev. 2021).

TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC v. Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC (TPOV Enterprises 16, LLC v. Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.