T.P. v. State
Opinion
T.P. appeals from an order finding him in violation of section 806.13, Florida Statutes (1993).
We reluctantly reverse for failure of the trial court to hold an adequate hearing pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971), when the State disclosed for the first time at trial, an alleged confession by the Appellant.1 Although a Richardson violation is no longer per se reversible error, we are unable to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation. State v. Schopp, 653 So.2d 1016 (Fla.1995).
Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
656 So. 2d 951 (T.P. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.