T.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services

District Court of Appeal of Florida

T.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services

892 So. 2d 1167, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 870, 2005 WL 230959

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in T.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13254 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 2, 2005·No. No. 2D04-947·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

T.P. (the Mother) and D.P. (the Father) appeal the trial court’s order adjudicating their daughter, K.P., and their son, D.P. to be dependent. The Department of Children and Family Services properly concedes that the adjudication of D.P. as dependent is not supported by competent, substantial evidence with respect to the Mother. We reverse the adjudication of D.P. to be dependent with respect to the Mother only. We affirm the order under review in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

T.P. (the Mother) and D.P. (the Father) appeal the trial court’s order adjudicating their daughter, K.P., and their son, D.P. to be dependent. The Department of Children and Family Services properly concedes that the adjudication of D.P. as dependent is not supported by competent, substantial evidence with respect to the Mother. We reverse the adjudication of D.P. to be dependent with respect to the Mother only. We affirm the order under review in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SALCINES, STRINGER, and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

T.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services, 892 So. 2d 1167, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 870, 2005 WL 230959 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

892 So. 2d 1167 (T.P. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.