Tozer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Court of Appeals

Tozer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

1 Silv. Ct. App. 371, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 447

DecidedMarch 8, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Silv. Ct. App. 371 (Tozer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tozer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 1 Silv. Ct. App. 371, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 447 (N.Y. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case falls within our decision in Strohm v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 96 N. Y. 305. The testimony which was received under exception, as to the ulterior consequences which might ensue or be apprehended from the injuries received by the plaintiff, was quite as objectionable as that for the reception of which the judgment in the case cited was reversed.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case falls within our decision in Strohm v. N. Y., L. E. & W. R. R. Co., 96 N. Y. 305. The testimony which was received under exception, as to the ulterior consequences which might ensue or be apprehended from the injuries received by the plaintiff, was quite as objectionable as that for the reception of which the judgment in the case cited was reversed.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Silv. Ct. App. 371, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tozer-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-ny-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack