Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 356
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1962
DocketNo. 66513; protest 60/31050 (Los Angeles)
StatusPublished
This text of 48 Cust. Ct. 356 (Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 356 (cusc 1962).
Opinion
[357]*357Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as friction tape, was made of plastic, not specially enumerated in the tariff act, similar in use to cotton friction tape, wholly or in chief value of cotton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cust. Ct. 356, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toyota-motor-sales-usa-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1962.