Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States
48 Cust. Ct. 356
United States Customs Court·Decided March 5, 1962·No. No. 66513; protest 60/31050 (Los Angeles)·Published
Opinion
[357]*357Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as friction tape, was made of plastic, not specially enumerated in the tariff act, similar in use to cotton friction tape, wholly or in chief value of cotton, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 48 Cust. Ct. 356 (cusc 1962).
48 Cust. Ct. 356 (Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.