Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States

969 F. Supp. 1350, 21 C.I.T. 798

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedJuly 15, 1997

DocketSlip Op. 97-98; Court No. 94-02-00106

StatusPublished

This text of 969 F. Supp. 1350 (Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 969 F. Supp. 1350, 21 C.I.T. 798 (cit 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment Order

CARMAN, Chief Judge.

On June 14, 1996, this Court remanded to the Department of Commerce several issues arising from plaintiffs challenge to the administrative review covering the period between June 1, 1989 and May 31, 1990, of an antidumping order on certain internal-combustion, industrial forklift trucks from Japan. See Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 930 F.Supp. 636 (CIT 1996). In compliance with this Court’s remand order, the Department of Commerce filed its remand results on October 9, 1996. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 930 F.Supp. 636 (CIT 1996) (date stamped Oct. 9, 1996)(“Redetermination”).

Observing that plaintiff has submitted comments requesting this Court uphold Commerce’s Redetermination, and noting [1351]*1351that defendant and defendant-intervenor have not filed comments on the Redetermination, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department of Commeree’s Redetermination is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment Order

CARMAN, Chief Judge.

On June 14, 1996, this Court remanded to the Department of Commerce several issues arising from plaintiffs challenge to the administrative review covering the period between June 1, 1989 and May 31, 1990, of an antidumping order on certain internal-combustion, industrial forklift trucks from Japan. See Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 930 F.Supp. 636 (CIT 1996). In compliance with this Court’s remand order, the Department of Commerce filed its remand results on October 9, 1996. See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand: Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. United States, 930 F.Supp. 636 (CIT 1996) (date stamped Oct. 9, 1996)(“Redetermination”).

Observing that plaintiff has submitted comments requesting this Court uphold Commerce’s Redetermination, and noting [1351]*1351that defendant and defendant-intervenor have not filed comments on the Redetermination, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Department of Commeree’s Redetermination is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 F. Supp. 1350, 21 C.I.T. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toyota-motor-sales-usa-inc-v-united-states-cit-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack