Township of Teaneck v. Teaneck Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n
832 A.2d 315, 177 N.J. 560, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1137
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Collester’s opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 353 N.J.Super. 289, 802 A.2d 569 (2002).
For affirming—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA, ZAZZALI, ALBIN and ' WALLACE—7.
Opposed—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Township of Teaneck v. Teaneck Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n, 832 A.2d 315, 177 N.J. 560, 2003 N.J. LEXIS 1137 (N.J. 2003).
832 A.2d 315 (Township of Teaneck v. Teaneck Firemen's Mutual Benevolent Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In the Matter of Township of Mount Olive and Fop Lodge 122
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY (DIVISION OF STATE POLICE) VS. STATE TROOPERS FRATERNAL ASSOCIATION OF NEW JERSEY (PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018
In re the City of Camden
58 A.3d 1186 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2013)
Township of Franklin v. Franklin Township PBA Local 154
37 A.3d 1162 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2012)
Local 2071, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. Town of Bellingham
854 N.E.2d 1005 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 2006)