Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead
156 A. 657, 108 N.J.L. 202, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 252
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 N.J. Misc. 1034 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Lloyd, Case, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead, 156 A. 657, 108 N.J.L. 202, 1931 N.J. LEXIS 252 (N.J. 1931).
156 A. 657 (Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.