Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124

764 A.2d 940, 166 N.J. 112, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1222
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 11, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Per Curiam opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 334 N.J.Super. 512, 760 A.2d 326 (1999).

For affirmance — Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices O’HERN, STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, and VERNIERO — 6.-

For dismissal as improvidently granted — Justice LaVECCHIA — 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124, 764 A.2d 940, 166 N.J. 112, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1222 (N.J. 2000).

764 A.2d 940 (Township of Middletown v. Middletown PBA Local 124) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bergen County PBA Local 134 v. Donovan
92 A.3d 1181 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)