Township of Howell v. Sagorodny
138 A.2d 13, 25 N.J. 502, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Clapp in the court below, reported at 46 N. J. Super. 182 (App. Div. 1957).
For affirmance — Chief Justice Wbintraub, and Justices Heher, Burling, Jacobs, Erancis and Proctor — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Township of Howell v. Sagorodny, 138 A.2d 13, 25 N.J. 502, 1958 N.J. LEXIS 279 (N.J. 1958).
138 A.2d 13 (Township of Howell v. Sagorodny) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Town of Islip v. Zalak
165 A.D.2d 83 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Trombetta v. Atlantic City
436 A.2d 1349 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1981)
Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. Kearny
359 A.2d 862 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1976)
MONM. JCT. MOB. HOME PK. v. So. Bruns. Tp.
256 A.2d 721 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Larson v. MAYOR
240 A.2d 31 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
Belleville Chamber of Commerce v. Town of Belleville
238 A.2d 181 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1968)
Cranberry Lake Quarry Co. v. Johnson
231 A.2d 837 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Andover Tp. v. Lake
214 A.2d 870 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)