Township of Homer v. Smith

Michigan Supreme Court

Township of Homer v. Smith

105 N.W. 12, 141 Mich. 586, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 835

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 31, 1905

DocketDocket No. 49

StatusPublished

This text of 105 N.W. 12 (Township of Homer v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Township of Homer v. Smith, 105 N.W. 12, 141 Mich. 586, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 835 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

Ostrander, J.

(after stating the facts). The facts stated m the opinion of the learned circuit judge, and above set out, are in conformity with the record. There is nothing in the record showing or tending to show that defendant was owner of the property assessed. It was not assessed to him as trustee, or otherwise. The statutes, 1 Comp. Laws, §§ 3826, 3922, and the cases, City of Detroit v. Lewis, 109 Mich. 155 (32 L. R. A. 439), and H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co. v. Hagar, 118 Mich. 452, relied upon by counsel for appellant, have no application here. See, also, Township of Bangor v. Transportation [590]*590Co., 112 Mich. 601; City of Menominee v. Lumber Co., 119 Mich. 201; Township of Laketon v. Akeley, 74 Mich. 695.

The judgment of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and McAlvay, Grant, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ostrander, J.

(after stating the facts). The facts stated m the opinion of the learned circuit judge, and above set out, are in conformity with the record. There is nothing in the record showing or tending to show that defendant was owner of the property assessed. It was not assessed to him as trustee, or otherwise. The statutes, 1 Comp. Laws, §§ 3826, 3922, and the cases, City of Detroit v. Lewis, 109 Mich. 155 (32 L. R. A. 439), and H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co. v. Hagar, 118 Mich. 452, relied upon by counsel for appellant, have no application here. See, also, Township of Bangor v. Transportation [590]*590Co., 112 Mich. 601; City of Menominee v. Lumber Co., 119 Mich. 201; Township of Laketon v. Akeley, 74 Mich. 695.

The judgment of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and McAlvay, Grant, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 N.W. 12, 141 Mich. 586, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/township-of-homer-v-smith-mich-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack