Township of Homer v. Smith

105 N.W. 12, 141 Mich. 586, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 835
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 31, 1905·No. Docket No. 49·Published

Opinion

Ostrander, J.

(after stating the facts). The facts stated m the opinion of the learned circuit judge, and above set out, are in conformity with the record. There is nothing in the record showing or tending to show that defendant was owner of the property assessed. It was not assessed to him as trustee, or otherwise. The statutes, 1 Comp. Laws, §§ 3826, 3922, and the cases, City of Detroit v. Lewis, 109 Mich. 155 (32 L. R. A. 439), and H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co. v. Hagar, 118 Mich. 452, relied upon by counsel for appellant, have no application here. See, also, Township of Bangor v. Transportation [590] Co., 112 Mich. 601; City of Menominee v. Lumber Co., 119 Mich. 201; Township of Laketon v. Akeley, 74 Mich. 695.

The judgment of the circuit court was right, and it is affirmed.

Moore, C. J., and McAlvay, Grant, and Blair, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Township of Homer v. Smith, 105 N.W. 12, 141 Mich. 586, 1905 Mich. LEXIS 835 (Mich. 1905).

105 N.W. 12 (Township of Homer v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Township of Laketon v. Akeley
42 N.W. 165 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1889)
City of Detroit v. Lewis
32 L.R.A. 439 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1896)
Township of Bangor v. Smith Transportation Co.
71 N.W. 143 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co. v. Hagar
76 N.W. 980 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1898)
City of Menominee v. S. K. Martin Lumber Co.
77 N.W. 704 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)