Township of Cumming v. Schick
This text of 54 N.W. 40 (Township of Cumming v. Schick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record in this case contains the testimony offered on the trial and the judgment. No exceptions were taken to rulings on the trial, but it is sought to review the conclusion of the trial judge upon the whole testimony, though no findings of fact or of law were requested. Under these circumstances we cannot review the conclusions reached by the trial judge. We have no means of knowing definitely the grounds upon which the trial judge proceeded. The defeated party has not a right to a trial de novo in this Court. The case is ruled by Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440, and cases cited.
Judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 N.W. 40, 94 Mich. 222, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/township-of-cumming-v-schick-mich-1892.