Township of Cumming v. Schick

54 N.W. 40, 94 Mich. 222, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1106
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 22, 1892·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Montgomery, J.

The record in this case contains the testimony offered on the trial and the judgment. No exceptions were taken to rulings on the trial, but it is sought to review the conclusion of the trial judge upon the whole testimony, though no findings of fact or of law were requested. Under these circumstances we cannot review the conclusions reached by the trial judge. We have no means of knowing definitely the grounds upon which the trial judge proceeded. The defeated party has not a right to a trial de novo in this Court. The case is ruled by Haines v. Saviers, 93 Mich. 440, and cases cited.

Judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Township of Cumming v. Schick, 54 N.W. 40, 94 Mich. 222, 1892 Mich. LEXIS 1106 (Mich. 1892).

54 N.W. 40 (Township of Cumming v. Schick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Royal Oak Lumber & Supply Co.
137 N.W. 270 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1912)
Markey v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
129 N.W. 694 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1911)
Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Grand Rapids Bridge Co.
102 N.W. 975 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1905)
Wickes v. Pulfrey
91 N.W. 633 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1902)
Old Second National Bank v. Williams
71 N.W. 150 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Robson v. Dayton
69 N.W. 834 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Barnum v. Andrews
63 N.W. 983 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Gemberling v. Lazarus
58 N.W. 1005 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)