Township of Brick v. Spivak

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Township of Brick v. Spivak

230 A.2d 503, 49 N.J. 400, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 240

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedJune 12, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 230 A.2d 503 (Township of Brick v. Spivak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Township of Brick v. Spivak, 230 A.2d 503, 49 N.J. 400, 1967 N.J. LEXIS 240 (N.J. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants’ position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.

No costs.

Eor affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hare- man—7.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI