Township of Brick v. Spivak
Opinion
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons given in the majority opinion. Appellants’ position depends upon the hypothesis that the Legislature in fact intended that a majority vote for three candidates shall result in the election of the next four candidates as well. We cannot be sure the Legislature so intended. We see no substantial constitutional issue.
No costs.
Eor affirmance—Chief Justice Weinteatjb and Justices Jacobs, Fbancis, Peootoe, Hall, Schettino and Hare- man—7.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
230 A.2d 503 (Township of Brick v. Spivak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.