Townsend v. Wilson

104 S.E. 913, 25 Ga. App. 813, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 227
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 11, 1920
Docket11465
StatusPublished

This text of 104 S.E. 913 (Townsend v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. Wilson, 104 S.E. 913, 25 Ga. App. 813, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 227 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinions

Stephens, J.

Where, on the hearing in the court of ordinary of an application-for the appointment of a guardian, the applicant consented to the appointment of another, who was then appointed by the court of ordinary, but who afterwards refused to qualify, and the ordinary by order at a subsequent term appointed a third party, the applicant could enter an appeal from the latter order to the superior court; and it was error to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the applicant had consented to the first order appointing as guardian the person who failed to qualify.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., concurs. Smith, J., dissents. Alfred Herrington Jr., for plaintiff in error. A. L. Hatcher, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 S.E. 913, 25 Ga. App. 813, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-wilson-gactapp-1920.