Townsend v. Warren

24 S.E. 960, 99 Ga. 105
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 960 (Townsend v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. Warren, 24 S.E. 960, 99 Ga. 105 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The law of this case is settled by the decision of this court in Bently v. Terry, 59 Ga. 555; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered by the ordinary upon the writ of habeas corpus, there was no error in overruling the certiorari and thus affirming that judgment. Judgment affirmed.

Fouche & Fouche, for plaintiff. George A. H. Harris, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilkinson v. Lee
75 S.E. 477 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Evans v. Lane
70 S.E. 603 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Peese v. Gellerman
110 S.W. 196 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Southern Railway Co. v. Flemister
48 S.E. 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)
Lamar v. Harris
44 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 960, 99 Ga. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-warren-ga-1896.