Townsend v. Warren

Supreme Court of Georgia

Townsend v. Warren

24 S.E. 960, 99 Ga. 105

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1896·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The law of this case is settled by the decision of this court in Bently v. Terry, 59 Ga. 555; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered by the ordinary upon the writ of habeas corpus, there was no error in overruling the certiorari and thus affirming that judgment. Judgment affirmed.

Fouche & Fouche, for plaintiff. George A. H. Harris, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Atkinson, J.

The law of this case is settled by the decision of this court in Bently v. Terry, 59 Ga. 555; and the evidence, though conflicting, being amply sufficient to sustain the judgment rendered by the ordinary upon the writ of habeas corpus, there was no error in overruling the certiorari and thus affirming that judgment. Judgment affirmed.

Fouche & Fouche, for plaintiff. George A. H. Harris, for defendant.

Townsend v. Warren, 24 S.E. 960, 99 Ga. 105 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

24 S.E. 960 (Townsend v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related