Townsend v. Van Buskirk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Townsend v. Van Buskirk

52 A.D. 624, 65 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D. 624 (Townsend v. Van Buskirk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Townsend v. Van Buskirk, 52 A.D. 624, 65 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

The statute overlooked by counsel can be brought to the attention of the Special Term upon’the new trial, which has been ordered. All the rights of the plaintiff may thus be preserved. The omission is not deemed a sufficient reason for granting a new argument after a lapse of two and a half years and after so great a change as has taken place in the constitution of this court. Motion for reargument denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The statute overlooked by counsel can be brought to the attention of the Special Term upon’the new trial, which has been ordered. All the rights of the plaintiff may thus be preserved. The omission is not deemed a sufficient reason for granting a new argument after a lapse of two and a half years and after so great a change as has taken place in the constitution of this court. Motion for reargument denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D. 624, 65 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-van-buskirk-nyappdiv-1900.