Townsend v. Townsend
5 Del. 125
Opinion
The plaintiff’s book of accounts is not evidence of cash lent or of cash paid. It is not sufficient evidence in itself of a balance due on a settlement between the parties; the entry of “a bay horse $45,” needs confirmation by other evidence of the sale and price; a horse is not an article of ordinary merchandise; “ tallage and tavern expenses” must be a charge for cash paid for tallage and tavern expenses; arid is not proper. The “ lot of wheat on the ground” also needs confirmation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Townsend v. Townsend, 5 Del. 125 (Del. Ct. App. 1848).
5 Del. 125 (Townsend v. Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.