Townsend v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Townsend v. State

338 S.W.3d 415, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 481, 2011 WL 1363305

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 12, 2011

DocketWD 72209

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 338 S.W.3d 415 (Townsend v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Townsend v. State, 338 S.W.3d 415, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 481, 2011 WL 1363305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dominick Townsend appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s decision is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Dominick Townsend appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s decision is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

338 S.W.3d 415, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 481, 2011 WL 1363305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack