Townsend v. State
338 S.W.3d 415, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 481, 2011 WL 1363305
Opinion
ORDER
Dominick Townsend appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the motion court’s decision is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Townsend v. State, 338 S.W.3d 415, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 481, 2011 WL 1363305 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
338 S.W.3d 415 (Townsend v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goode v. State
338 S.W.3d 415 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)