Townsend v. State
68 S.E. 333, 7 Ga. App. 811, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 534
Opinion
It not being affirmatively shown that the offense was committed prior to the finding of the indictment, the conviction was unauthorized by law. Tharpe v. State, 2 Ga. App. 649 (58 S. E. 1070); Askew v. State, 3 Ga. App. 79 (59 S. E. 311) ; Minhinnett v. State, 106 Ga. 141 (32 S. E. 19). Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Townsend v. State, 68 S.E. 333, 7 Ga. App. 811, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
68 S.E. 333 (Townsend v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minhinnett v. State
32 S.E. 19 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Tharpe v. State
58 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Askew v. State
59 S.E. 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)