Townsend v. State

68 S.E. 333, 7 Ga. App. 811, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 534
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 14, 1910
Docket2632
StatusPublished

This text of 68 S.E. 333 (Townsend v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. State, 68 S.E. 333, 7 Ga. App. 811, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 534 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, O. J.

It not being affirmatively shown that the offense was committed prior to the finding of the indictment, the conviction was unauthorized by law. Tharpe v. State, 2 Ga. App. 649 (58 S. E. 1070); Askew v. State, 3 Ga. App. 79 (59 S. E. 311) ; Minhinnett v. State, 106 Ga. 141 (32 S. E. 19). Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minhinnett v. State
32 S.E. 19 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Tharpe v. State
58 S.E. 1070 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Askew v. State
59 S.E. 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 333, 7 Ga. App. 811, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-state-gactapp-1910.