Townsend v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Townsend v. State

904 So. 2d 573, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9070, 2005 WL 1383349

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 13, 2005

DocketNo. 1D05-0851

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 904 So. 2d 573 (Townsend v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Townsend v. State, 904 So. 2d 573, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9070, 2005 WL 1383349 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s request for a belated appeal is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. The request does not constitute one of the enumerated grounds for filing a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(a). Thus, the trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. This disposition is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a Petition for Belated Appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

AFFIRMED.

WEBSTER, DAVIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI