Townsend v. State
904 So. 2d 573, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9070, 2005 WL 1383349
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 2005·No. No. 1D05-0851·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant’s request for a belated appeal is not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion. The request does not constitute one of the enumerated grounds for filing a rule 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(a). Thus, the trial court correctly denied the appellant’s motion.
Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. This disposition is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a Petition for Belated Appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Townsend v. State, 904 So. 2d 573, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 9070, 2005 WL 1383349 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
904 So. 2d 573 (Townsend v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Presley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N.
904 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)