Townsend v. Nelson

212 So. 2d 899
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1968·No. No. J-427·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee in an action arising from injuries sustained by appellant when an automobile owned by his neighbor inadvertently jumped forward while his neighbor was working on the starting mechanism.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment appealed is accordingly affirmed. Cochran v. Abercrombie, 118 So.2d 636, 79 A.L.R.2d 986 (Fla.App.2d 1960); Pass v. Friedman, 140 So.2d 883 (Fla.App.3d 1962).

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townsend v. Nelson, 212 So. 2d 899 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

212 So. 2d 899 (Townsend v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Katz v. Harrington
226 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)