Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau

E.D. Michigan

Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau

DecidedApril 10, 2023

Docket4:23-cv-10738

StatusUnknown

This text of Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau (Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau, (E.D. Mich. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAYSHUN CORNELIUS TOWNSEND, Case No. 23-cv-10738 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. U.S. District Judge

MPD HOMICIDE BUREAU, ET AL.

Defendants. /

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

On March 30, 2023, Plaintiff Rayshun Cornelius Townsend, who is incarcerated at the Shelby County Jail in Memphis, Tennessee, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). On March 31, 2023, he filed two supplemental pleadings. (ECF Nos. 2, 3). Having reviewed the complaint and supplemental papers, the Court concludes that the case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. Venue for a federal action generally lies in the district in which any defendant resides or in which “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” District courts have “the discretion to transfer cases on an individual basis by considering convenience and fairness.” Kerobo v. Southwestern Clean Fuels, Corp., 285 F.3d 531, 537 (6th Cir. 2002). The three named defendants are located in Shelby County, Tennessee and the events giving rise to the complaint occurred there as well. Shelby County is located in the Western District of Tennessee. See 28 U.S.C. § 123. Venue is therefore proper in the United States

District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, not this Court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of Court to transfer this case to the federal court in the Western District of Tennessee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). SO ORDERED. s/F. Kay Behm F. KAY BEHM United States District Judge Dated: April 10, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

RAYSHUN CORNELIUS TOWNSEND, Case No. 23-cv-10738 Plaintiff, F. Kay Behm v. U.S. District Judge

MPD HOMICIDE BUREAU, ET AL.

Defendants. /

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

On March 30, 2023, Plaintiff Rayshun Cornelius Townsend, who is incarcerated at the Shelby County Jail in Memphis, Tennessee, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). On March 31, 2023, he filed two supplemental pleadings. (ECF Nos. 2, 3). Having reviewed the complaint and supplemental papers, the Court concludes that the case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. Venue for a federal action generally lies in the district in which any defendant resides or in which “a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), “[f]or the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.” District courts have “the discretion to transfer cases on an individual basis by considering convenience and fairness.” Kerobo v. Southwestern Clean Fuels, Corp., 285 F.3d 531, 537 (6th Cir. 2002). The three named defendants are located in Shelby County, Tennessee and the events giving rise to the complaint occurred there as well. Shelby County is located in the Western District of Tennessee. See 28 U.S.C. § 123. Venue is therefore proper in the United States

District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, not this Court. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of Court to transfer this case to the federal court in the Western District of Tennessee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). SO ORDERED. s/F. Kay Behm F. KAY BEHM United States District Judge Dated: April 10, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Townsend v. MPD Homicide Bureau, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-mpd-homicide-bureau-mied-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack