Townsend v. . McCullum
This text of 95 S.E. 364 (Townsend v. . McCullum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The great weight of evidence in this case tends to prove that defendant is a merchant in the town of Star, N. C.; that on 31 M^rch, 1916, he was engaged in shooting sparrows in the town and very near the Leach Hotel with a 27 Winchester rifle. In firing the rifle he sent a ball into the toilet of the hotel, which was sixty yards distant from where defendant was shooting and shot plaintiff in the head, inflicting a painful and severe wound.
We have examined the entire evidence and record and find no error. In the absence of prohibitive ordinance the defendant was guilty of such reckless conduct, if the evidence is to be believed, as must render him liable to plaintiff for the injury inflicted.
If defendant had killed plaintiff he would probably have to answer a charge of manslaughter as well as this demand for damages.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 S.E. 364, 175 N.C. 698, 1918 N.C. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-mccullum-nc-1918.