Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.
This text of 270 So. 2d 396 (Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So.2d 594; Chaney v. Brown (1947) 158 Fla. 489, 29 So.2d 209; Connolly v. Sebeco (Fla.1956) 89 So.2d 482.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 So. 2d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-martin-mcclellan-co-fladistctapp-1972.