Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.

270 So. 2d 396
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 21, 1972
DocketNo. Q-412
StatusPublished

This text of 270 So. 2d 396 (Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co., 270 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So.2d 594; Chaney v. Brown (1947) 158 Fla. 489, 29 So.2d 209; Connolly v. Sebeco (Fla.1956) 89 So.2d 482.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Murray
68 So. 2d 594 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc.
89 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Chaney v. Brown
29 So. 2d 209 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 So. 2d 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-martin-mcclellan-co-fladistctapp-1972.