Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.

270 So. 2d 396

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 1972·No. No. Q-412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So.2d 594; Chaney v. Brown (1947) 158 Fla. 489, 29 So.2d 209; Connolly v. Sebeco (Fla.1956) 89 So.2d 482.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. F.S. Section 725.01, F.S.A. 1; Miller v. Murray (Fla.1954) 68 So.2d 594; Chaney v. Brown (1947) 158 Fla. 489, 29 So.2d 209; Connolly v. Sebeco (Fla.1956) 89 So.2d 482.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co., 270 So. 2d 396 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

270 So. 2d 396 (Townsend v. Martin-McClellan Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related