Townsend v. Louisiana State Marine & Fire Insurance
This text of 13 La. 551 (Townsend v. Louisiana State Marine & Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This case depends entirely on the validity of a voluntary assignment of the property of a debtor, residing in Louisiana, for the benefit of certain creditors.
In the act of assignment the party creates a trustee, and dictates terms to his creditors, on the compliance with which, alone, they are to have any recourse on the property assigned. One debt is provided to be paid in full; and the other creditors, who may become parties to the act, are to be paid pro rata.
In Louisiana, the property of the debtor is the common pledge of his creditors, and an insolvent debtor can make no disposition of his property to the prejudice of his creditors.
An assignment of this kind we consider as void on its face, and that the judge of the Parish Court has not erred in sustaining the appropriation of the- -property seized to the payment of the judgment creditors.
The judgment of the Parish Court is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 La. 551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-louisiana-state-marine-fire-insurance-la-1839.