Townsend v. Lawrence

262 S.W.2d 55
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedNovember 9, 1953
Docket43577
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 262 S.W.2d 55 (Townsend v. Lawrence) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. Lawrence, 262 S.W.2d 55 (Mo. 1953).

Opinion

262 S.W.2d 55 (1953)

TOWNSEND
v.
LAWRENCE.

No. 43577.

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 2.

November 9, 1953.

J. William Cook, Crane, for appellant.

Rufe Scott, Galena, for respondent.

BOHLING, Commissioner.

This is an action in ejectment for the possession of real estate in Stone County, Missouri. Plaintiff, alleging ownership, seeks possession, $100 damages and $1 a month rent. Defendant answered denying the allegations of plaintiff's petition, alleging ownership, and asked to be discharged with his costs. Neither party sought an adjudication of title. The judgment was that plaintiff take nothing and that defendant be discharged with his costs. It did not adjudge title in plaintiff or defendant.

Plaintiff, upon his appeal, says we have jurisdiction because title to real estate is involved. No authority is cited. Ejectment is a possessory action. Under our rulings title to real estate is only incidentally or collaterally involved in the instant case and appellate jurisdiction is in the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals may properly inquire into the matter of title when incidentally involved as the basis of a claim to possession. Ballenger v. Windes, 338 Mo. 1039, 93 S.W.2d 882, 883[2-4]; Gibbany v. Walker, 342 Mo. 156, 113 S.W.2d 792; State ex rel. Edie v. Shain, 348 Mo. 119, 152 S.W.2d 174, 176[1-3]; Hinkle v. Wood, Mo., 155 S.W.2d 191; Motchar v. Hollingsworth, Mo., 162 S.W.2d 805, 807[2-5]; 17 Mo.L.R. 103.

The cause is transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals.

*56 WESTHUES and BARRETT, CC., concur.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion by BOHLING, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

M_ C_ B v. V_ T
578 S.W.2d 610 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Matter of C----W----B
578 S.W.2d 610 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979)
Smith v. McClard
439 S.W.2d 246 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1969)
Smith v. McClard
426 S.W.2d 109 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1968)
Luttrell v. State Highway Commission
367 S.W.2d 615 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1963)
Moore v. Rone
355 S.W.2d 398 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1962)
Domyan v. Dornin
348 S.W.2d 360 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1961)
City of St. Charles v. De Sherlia
303 S.W.2d 32 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1957)
Deacon v. City of Ladue
294 S.W.2d 616 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1956)
Wakefield v. Thorp
283 S.W.2d 467 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)
Albi v. Reed
281 S.W.2d 882 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)
Levee District No. 4 of Dunklin County v. Small
281 S.W.2d 614 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1955)
In Re Cole
274 S.W.2d 601 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1955)
Judge v. Durham
274 S.W.2d 247 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 S.W.2d 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-lawrence-mo-1953.