Townsend v. Keenan

2 Hilt. 544
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedMarch 16, 1859
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Hilt. 544 (Townsend v. Keenan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townsend v. Keenan, 2 Hilt. 544 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1859).

Opinion

Hilton, J.

The appeal herein from the justice of the Sixth District Court was noticed for argument, on the part of the appellant, for January term, and was accordingly placed upon the calendar, there to continue without further notice, and until finally disposed of by the court. Code, § 364. The appellant failed to ■ appear when the case was regularly called at the last general term, and the respondent asked for and obtained an affirmance of the judgment. There was no irregularity in his proceedings, and, as the appellant fails to show any excuse for his neglect, no reason exists for vacating the judgment thus entered.

An appeal from a justice’s judgment differs from all other appeals, in not requiring to be noticed by either party after it has been regularly placed upon the calendar. By a special statutory provision, (Code, § 364), it remains upon the calendar until finally disposed of by the court, and unless the appellant appears when it is regularly called, the respondent is entitled to an affirm: anee of the judgment. This is the usual course, and was followed in the present case.

Motion denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Martin
11 N.Y.S. 424 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1890)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Hilt. 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-keenan-nyctcompl-1859.