Townsend v. KASLE STEEL CORPORATION
This text of 769 N.W.2d 711 (Townsend v. KASLE STEEL CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
David E. TOWNSEND, Heidi A. Townsend, Lindsay R. Townsend, Heather M. Townsend, and David J. Townsend, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross-Appellees,
v.
KASLE STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, and
Kerry Steel, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
769 N.W.2d 711, 484 Mich. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-kasle-steel-corporation-mich-2009.