Townsend v. Ingersoll
This text of 43 How. Pr. 276 (Townsend v. Ingersoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—The payment made by defendant upon the note in question to the plaintiff before she had taken oat letters of administration on the estate of her husband, was a good payment to her as administratrix, she subsequently having taken out letters. She had possession of the note, and the payment was for the benefit of the estate, and all her acts are confirmed, for the benefit of the estate from the time of the death of her husband, by relation.
The evidence fully sustains the referee in his finding, that the note was not given by defendant to deceased' as collateral security for any debt due from-O. S. Gregory and defendant as partners, or for a debt due deceased from Gregory, or as collateral security for the performance, of" any agreement upon the part of said Gregory.
The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 How. Pr. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-ingersoll-nysupct-1872.