Townsend v. E. B. Stoddard & Co.
This text of 26 Ga. 430 (Townsend v. E. B. Stoddard & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[431]*431 By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
The time of holding the Court had been but recently changed when the process was issued, and the Acts had not been published; yet, as the Legislature had made no provision for process issued during the time intervening the passing of the Act and its publication, it must be considered that the defendant was required, by the process, to appear at a time different from that fixed by the law. But he appeared at the legal time of holding the Court, and at which the process ought to have required him to appear, and actually by his counsel moved in the cause. The Court heard his motion and decided upon and ordered both declaration and process to be amended. The decision is in harmony with the spirit of the statute of amendrhents, and the defendant is in no manner prejudiced by it. In fact, his appearancej was a waiver of defects and errors in the process calling him to the Court.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 Ga. 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-e-b-stoddard-co-ga-1858.