Townsend v. Doe ex dem. Chapin
This text of 8 Blackf. 328 (Townsend v. Doe ex dem. Chapin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
AFTER the testimony in this case was closed, the defendants moved that every instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof to the jury, should be in writing, and objected [329]*329to any instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof being given, unless the same should be written. Held, that the Court, by afterwards giving, at the plaintiff’s request, instructions to the jury with verbal explanations and illustrations, committed an error. Stat. 1839, ,p. 37.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Blackf. 328, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townsend-v-doe-ex-dem-chapin-ind-1847.