Towns v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

District Court, N.D. Mississippi·Decided July 12, 2021·No. 4:19-cv-00070·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

JASON TOWNS PLAINTIFF

V. CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19-CV-70-SA-JMV

MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. DEFENDANTS

ORDER

On May 24, 2021, Magistrate Judge Virden entered a Report and Recommendation [68]. The Report and Recommendation [68] sets forth an extensive procedural history of the case and ultimately reaches the conclusion that the Plaintiff’s Motion [64] requesting permission to serve Defendant Eugene Antonio Shorter out of time should be denied. Magistrate Judge Virden clearly set forth the reasoning for her recommendation. The Report and Recommendation [68] specifically advised the parties as to the applicable procedure for filing an objection to the Report and Recommendation. Although the time to file an objection has expired, no objection has been filed. “With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F. Supp. 2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428–29 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation [68] and the record as a whole, the Court finds that there is no plain error. The Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation [68]. The Plaintiff’s Motion [64] is DENIED. The Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Shorter in his individual capacity are dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED, this the 12th day of July, 2021. /s/ Sharion Aycock UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Towns v. Mississippi Department of Corrections, (N.D. Miss. 2021).

Towns v. Mississippi Department of Corrections (Towns v. Mississippi Department of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gauthier v. Union Pacific Railroad
644 F. Supp. 2d 824 (E.D. Texas, 2009)