Townley v. Import Chemical Co.

173 A.D. 960

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Upon the complaint as framed, we are satisfied that there is but one cause of action attempted to be set forth. Upon the question whether there is a cause of action which would withstand demurrer, we express no opinion. (See Matter of Bouker Contracting Co. v. Calahan Contracting Co., 93 Misc. Rep. 341; affd., on opinion of Lehman, J., 173 App. Div. 906.) The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present — Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Smith and Page, JJ. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Townley v. Import Chemical Co., 173 A.D. 960 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

173 A.D. 960 (Townley v. Import Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mazurajtis v. Maknawyce
93 Misc. 337 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)