Townley v. Import Chemical Co.

158 N.Y.S. 1133, 173 A.D. 960, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470

This text of 158 N.Y.S. 1133 (Townley v. Import Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Townley v. Import Chemical Co., 158 N.Y.S. 1133, 173 A.D. 960, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the complaint as framed, we are satisfied that there is but one cause of action attempted to be set forth. Upon the question whether there is a cause of action which would withstand demurrer, we express no opinion. See In re Bouker Contracting Co. v. Callahan Contracting Co., 92 Misc. Rep. 241, 155 N. Y. Supp. 543, affirmed by this court on opinion of Lehman, J., at appellate Term, Jan. 14, 1916, 156 N. Y. Supp. 1116. The order appealed from is therefore affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bouker Contracting Co. v. W. H. Callahan Contracting Co.
92 Misc. 241 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 N.Y.S. 1133, 173 A.D. 960, 1916 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townley-v-import-chemical-co-nyappdiv-1916.