Townley v. Bruckman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Townley v. Bruckman

255 A.D. 943, 8 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 943 (Townley v. Bruckman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Townley v. Bruckman, 255 A.D. 943, 8 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of New York State Liquor Authority confirmed and proceeding dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The law itself authorizes the hearing to be conducted by such a subordinate officer as conducted the hearing in this case and the strict rules of evidence are not applicable to such hearings. We find that the local rule as to closing hours was sufficiently established by oral proof and the admission of the petitioner-licensee. All concur. (Certiorari proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the action of the State Liquor Authority in revoking a liquor license.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of New York State Liquor Authority confirmed and proceeding dismissed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: The law itself authorizes the hearing to be conducted by such a subordinate officer as conducted the hearing in this case and the strict rules of evidence are not applicable to such hearings. We find that the local rule as to closing hours was sufficiently established by oral proof and the admission of the petitioner-licensee. All concur. (Certiorari proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the action of the State Liquor Authority in revoking a liquor license.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 943, 8 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/townley-v-bruckman-nyappdiv-1938.