Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton

1 Root 175
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1790
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 175 (Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton, 1 Root 175 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).

Opinion

By the Court.

As to the two first exceptions, the signing and serving of the writ, are merely ministerial acts, and if any irregularity is practiced, advantage may be taken of it by pleading it. Resides, if members of corporations were wholly excluded from acts of this nature, there would be a, failure of justice in many cases. As to the third exception, the law doth not require it; hut if necessary it may be done after the writ is returned, by leave of the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yudkin v. Gates
22 A. 776 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1891)
Doolittle v. Clark
47 Conn. 316 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-windham-v-town-of-hampton-connsuperct-1790.