Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton
1 Root 175
Opinion
As to the two first exceptions, the signing and serving of the writ, are merely ministerial acts, and if any irregularity is practiced, advantage may be taken of it by pleading it. Resides, if members of corporations were wholly excluded from acts of this nature, there would be a, failure of justice in many cases. As to the third exception, the law doth not require it; hut if necessary it may be done after the writ is returned, by leave of the court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton, 1 Root 175 (Colo. Ct. App. 1790).
1 Root 175 (Town of Windham v. Town of Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yudkin v. Gates
22 A. 776 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1891)
Doolittle v. Clark
47 Conn. 316 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1879)