Town of West Miami v. Weinkle

Supreme Court of Florida

Town of West Miami v. Weinkle

175 So. 2d 196, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3159

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 19, 1965·No. No. 34021·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, 170 So.2d 61, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that [197]*197the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, 170 So.2d 61, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that [197]*197the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.

Town of West Miami v. Weinkle, 175 So. 2d 196, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3159 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

175 So. 2d 196 (Town of West Miami v. Weinkle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related