Town of Rockingham v. Coley

155 S.E. 871, 199 N.C. 745, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 238
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 19, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 871 (Town of Rockingham v. Coley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Rockingham v. Coley, 155 S.E. 871, 199 N.C. 745, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 238 (N.C. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover $705.63 as assessments on the defendant’s abutting lot for improvements made by the plaintiff in 1914 on 'Washington and Randolph streets. The defendant denied liability and pleaded the statute of limitations. When the ease was called for trial the plaintiff made a motion to amend its complaint by pleading chapters 309 and 326 of the Private Laws of 1911. The motion was denied and the plaintiff excepted.

The appellant admits that the action cannot he maintained unless the amendment is allowed. Whether a pleading shall be amended is ordinarily a matter within the discretion of the judge or the trial court, and the exercise of discretion is not reviewable except for palpable abuse. Gordon v. Gas Co., 178 N. C., 435. We find nothing in the record which tends to indicate an abuse of discretion by the judge who presided at the trial. Judgment

Af&rmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Granite Co. v. . Bank
90 S.E. 312 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.E. 871, 199 N.C. 745, 1930 N.C. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-rockingham-v-coley-nc-1930.