Town of Putnam Valley v. Slutzky

256 A.D. 929, 9 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5496

This text of 256 A.D. 929 (Town of Putnam Valley v. Slutzky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Putnam Valley v. Slutzky, 256 A.D. 929, 9 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5496 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

Submission of a contro[930]*930versy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 546 of the Civil Practice Act dismissed, without costs to either party. The statement of facts is not sufficient to enable the court to render judgment. It does not appear that the bills rendered by the respondent were paid, although it may be inferred such is the fact. But the court may not draw inferences of fact from the facts within the stipulated case. (Morx v. Brogan, 188 N. Y. 431; Title Guar. & Tr. Co. v. Mort. Comm,,, 271 id. 302, 305; Ormond Realty Co. v. Consolidated T. Corporation, 238 App. Div. 118.) Nor may the court consider the statements in the briefs. (McGoldrick v. Bodkin, 140 App. Div. 196.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marx v. . Brogan
81 N.E. 231 (New York Court of Appeals, 1907)
McGoldrick v. Bodkin
140 A.D. 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)
Ormond Realty Co. v. Consolidated Trimming Corp.
238 A.D. 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D. 929, 9 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-putnam-valley-v-slutzky-nyappdiv-1939.