Town of Peru v. State
35 A.D.2d 875, 315 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3437
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 23, 1970·No. Claim No. 47204·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
[876]*876Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur; Cooke, J., concurs in the following memorandum : I concur in the result. (See General Municipal Law, § 3; Central School Dist. No. 1 of Town of Colchester v. State of New York, 18 A D 2d 943, affd. 13 N Y 2d 1031.) The taking was for a substantially different purpose from the existing use. [59 Misc 2d 49.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Peru v. State, 35 A.D.2d 875, 315 N.Y.S.2d 775, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3437 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).
35 A.D.2d 875 (Town of Peru v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Atlantic States Legal Foundation v. Onondaga County Department of Drainage & Sanitation
233 F. Supp. 2d 335 (N.D. New York, 2001)
City of New York v. State
93 Misc. 2d 335 (New York State Court of Claims, 1978)
City of New York v. State
48 A.D.2d 79 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)