Town of Palm Beach v. Regco Developments, Inc.

440 So. 2d 54, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23607
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 9, 1983·No. Nos. 82-242, 82-1113·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court judgment which critically found that the property in question was “grandfathered” in as an existing non-conforming use as concerns the Town’s new zoning ordinance. Fortunato v. City of Coral Gables, 47 So.2d 321 (Fla.1950); Town of Palm Beach Zoning Code § 8.10 (1981); 101A C.J.S., Zoning and Land Planning § 154; 73 Am.Jur.2d, Statutes, § 313. Moreover, we find that the use under the former ordinance was proper under the authority of Ocean’s Edge Development Corp. v. Town of Juno Beach, 430 So.2d 472 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Palm Beach v. Regco Developments, Inc., 440 So. 2d 54, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 23607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

440 So. 2d 54 (Town of Palm Beach v. Regco Developments, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ocean's Edge Dev. Corp. v. Town of Juno Beach
430 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Fortunato v. City of Coral Gables
47 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1950)