Town of Oyster Bay v. Hendrickson Bros.

94 A.D.3d 1092, 945 N.Y.S.2d 563
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 A.D.3d 1092 (Town of Oyster Bay v. Hendrickson Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of Oyster Bay v. Hendrickson Bros., 94 A.D.3d 1092, 945 N.Y.S.2d 563 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for continuing public nuisance, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), entered May 19, 2011, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleges that, pursuant to a contract with Nassau County, the defendant completed certain sewer construction work in 1980, and that defects in the construction work constitute and contribute to a continuing public nuisance. The action is time-barred for the reasons stated in the companion case of Village of Lindenhurst v J.D. Posillico, Inc. (94 AD3d 1101 [2012] [decided herewith]).

[1093]*1093The plaintiffs contentions relating to alleged statutory violations are not properly before this Court. Rivera, J.E, Dillon, Angiolillo and Leventhal, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Town of Oyster Bay v. Lizza Industries, Inc.
4 N.E.3d 944 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 A.D.3d 1092, 945 N.Y.S.2d 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-oyster-bay-v-hendrickson-bros-nyappdiv-2012.