Town of Onondaga v. Ritter

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of Onondaga v. Ritter

78 A.D.3d 1516, 910 N.Y.S.2d 398

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.3d 1516 (Town of Onondaga v. Ritter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of Onondaga v. Ritter, 78 A.D.3d 1516, 910 N.Y.S.2d 398 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [John C. Cherundolo, A.J.], entered June 1, 2010) to review a determination of respondent. The determination, among other things, adjudged that Community Options Inc. may seek to establish an individualized residential alternative at 5081 Rosemary Lane in the Town of Onondaga.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed for reasons stated in the decision of respondent New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. Present— Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County [John C. Cherundolo, A.J.], entered June 1, 2010) to review a determination of respondent. The determination, among other things, adjudged that Community Options Inc. may seek to establish an individualized residential alternative at 5081 Rosemary Lane in the Town of Onondaga.

It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed for reasons stated in the decision of respondent New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. Present— Scudder, P.J., Peradotto, Carni, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.3d 1516, 910 N.Y.S.2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-onondaga-v-ritter-nyappdiv-2010.