Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds

171 A.D. 927, 159 N.Y.S. 1146

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 A.D. 905 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; trial changed to Kings county. While jurors, intelligent, conscientious and impartial, may be had in Nassau county, utterances in public prints and posters and the agitation resulting in the recent local election, with the wide interest in town litigations for recovery of shore frontage, make it safer to hold this trial in another county, wholly removed from any local feeling. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Staple-ton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs; trial changed to Kings county. While jurors, intelligent, conscientious and impartial, may be had in Nassau county, utterances in public prints and posters and the agitation resulting in the recent local election, with the wide interest in town litigations for recovery of shore frontage, make it safer to hold this trial in another county, wholly removed from any local feeling. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Staple-ton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds, 171 A.D. 927, 159 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

171 A.D. 927 (Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.