Town of North Hempstead v. Incorporated Village of Westbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Town of North Hempstead v. Incorporated Village of Westbury

208 A.D.2d 614, 618 N.Y.S.2d 226

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 11, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 614 (Town of North Hempstead v. Incorporated Village of Westbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Town of North Hempstead v. Incorporated Village of Westbury, 208 A.D.2d 614, 618 N.Y.S.2d 226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Joint motion by the appellants and the respondents in Action No. 1 for reargument of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which was determined by opinion and order of this Court dated August 17, 1992 [182 AD2d 272], and to permit withdrawal, without prejudice, of the motion by the respondents in Action No. 1, filed June 17, 1994, which was for the same relief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion by the respondents in Action No. 1, filed June 17, 1994, is withdrawn, without prejudice; and it is further,

Ordered that, upon reargument, the opinion and order of this Court, dated August 17, 1992, is amended, by deleting the first decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the following decretal paragraph: "ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof which declared Laws of 1983 (ch 544) unconstitutional and invalid and substituting therefor a provision declaring Laws of 1983 (ch 544) constitutional and valid, and (2) deleting the provision thereof which severed and continued the counterclaims of the Incorporated Village of Westbury and the Incorporated Village of Mineóla, and substituting therefor a provision dismissing those counterclaims; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements; and it is further,”

Upon reconsideration of our opinion and order, dated August 17, 1992, we conclude that Town of North Hempstead Code, chapter 46, § 46-14 violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution and is, thus, invalid (see, C & A Carbone v Town of Clarkstown, 511 US —, 114 S Ct 1677).

In all other respects, the opinion and order of this Court dated August 17, 1992, remains in full force and effect. [615]*615Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur. [As amended by unpublished order entered Nov. 23, 1994.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joint motion by the appellants and the respondents in Action No. 1 for reargument of an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which was determined by opinion and order of this Court dated August 17, 1992 [182 AD2d 272], and to permit withdrawal, without prejudice, of the motion by the respondents in Action No. 1, filed June 17, 1994, which was for the same relief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion by the respondents in Action No. 1, filed June 17, 1994, is withdrawn, without prejudice; and it is further,

Ordered that, upon reargument, the opinion and order of this Court, dated August 17, 1992, is amended, by deleting the first decretal paragraph thereof and substituting therefor the following decretal paragraph: "ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, by (1) deleting the provision thereof which declared Laws of 1983 (ch 544) unconstitutional and invalid and substituting therefor a provision declaring Laws of 1983 (ch 544) constitutional and valid, and (2) deleting the provision thereof which severed and continued the counterclaims of the Incorporated Village of Westbury and the Incorporated Village of Mineóla, and substituting therefor a provision dismissing those counterclaims; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs and disbursements; and it is further,”

Upon reconsideration of our opinion and order, dated August 17, 1992, we conclude that Town of North Hempstead Code, chapter 46, § 46-14 violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution and is, thus, invalid (see, C & A Carbone v Town of Clarkstown, 511 US —, 114 S Ct 1677).

In all other respects, the opinion and order of this Court dated August 17, 1992, remains in full force and effect. [615]*615Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Lawrence and Ritter, JJ., concur. [As amended by unpublished order entered Nov. 23, 1994.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

208 A.D.2d 614, 618 N.Y.S.2d 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-north-hempstead-v-incorporated-village-of-westbury-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack