Town of New Hartford v. Alagic

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 26, 2026
Docket265 CA 25-01019
StatusPublished

This text of Town of New Hartford v. Alagic (Town of New Hartford v. Alagic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Town of New Hartford v. Alagic, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Town of New Hartford v Alagic - 2026 NY Slip Op 04058
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Town of New Hartford v Alagic

2026 NY Slip Op 04058

June 26, 2026

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

TOWN OF NEW HARTFORD, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

MEAZ ALAGIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Decided on June 26, 2026

265 CA 25-01019

Present: Montour, J.P., Ogden, Greenwood, Nowak, And Hannah, JJ.

STEPHANIE R. DIGIORGIO, UTICA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOHN P. ORILIO, HINCKLEY, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Mark R. Rose, J.), entered November 19, 2024. The order prohibited defendant from impeding access to a right-of-way and scheduled further proceedings on damages.

[*1]

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a non-final liability order, following a bench trial, that prohibited defendant from impeding access to a right-of-way and scheduled further proceedings on damages. The appeal must be dismissed inasmuch as the order appealed from is not a final judgment and is not an order deciding a motion made upon notice (see generally CPLR 5701 [a] [1], [2]; Paese v Paese, 175 AD3d 506, 506 [2d Dept 2019]; Rossi v Morse, 153 AD3d 1637, 1637 [4th Dept 2017]). Defendant did not seek leave to appeal from the order, and we decline to treat the notice of appeal as an application for leave to appeal (see CPLR 5701 [c]; Gena v Mu, 240 AD3d 1405, 1406 [4th Dept 2025]).

Entered: June 26, 2026

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Town of New Hartford v. Alagic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/town-of-new-hartford-v-alagic-nyappdiv-2026.