Town of Milford v. Quincy Quarries Co.

346 N.E.2d 375, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 807, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 596
Massachusetts Appeals Court·Decided May 10, 1976·Published

Opinion

The present proceedings were correctly decided by a judge of the Land Court for the reasons given by him in his findings, rulings [808] and order for decree dated August 1, 1972. We remark that no question was raised below (see Henchey v. Cox, 348 Mass. 742, 747 [1965]) as to the sufficiency or content of the notice given to and received by the defendant in June, 1953, concerning the pendency of the proceedings brought by the plaintiff under G. L. c. 60, §§ 64-75. As the bill of exceptions presents no question which is not also raised by the appeal, the entries are

David M. Lipton (Hertz N. Henkoff with him) for the defendant. Carlton W. Spencer (Arthur Vitagliano & Nancy S. Leonard with him) for the plaintiff.

Exceptions dismissed.

Final decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Town of Milford v. Quincy Quarries Co., 346 N.E.2d 375, 4 Mass. App. Ct. 807, 1976 Mass. App. LEXIS 596 (Mass. Ct. App. 1976).

346 N.E.2d 375 (Town of Milford v. Quincy Quarries Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henchey v. Cox
205 N.E.2d 715 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)