Town of Marlborough v. Afscme, Council 4, Local 818-052
29 A.3d 466, 302 Conn. 940
Opinion
TOWN OF MARLBOROUGH
v.
AFSCME, COUNCIL 4, LOCAL 818-052.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Proloy K. Das and Andrew L. Houlding, Hartford, in support of the petition.
J. William Gagne, Jr., West Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 130 Conn.App. 556, 23 A.3d 798, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the arbitration award in this matter did not constitute a manifest disregard of the law in that General Statutes § 9-187(a) was not well defined as it related to `town officers?'"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Town of Marlborough v. Afscme, Council 4, Local 818-052, 29 A.3d 466, 302 Conn. 940 (Colo. 2011).
29 A.3d 466 (Town of Marlborough v. Afscme, Council 4, Local 818-052) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Albino
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2014
Fine v. Commissioner of Correction
81 A.3d 1209 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
Design Tech, LLC v. Moriniere
76 A.3d 712 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Barry A.
76 A.3d 211 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2013)
State v. Kurrus
49 A.3d 260 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)